DORA Compliance for Carrier Integrations: Security Implementation Guide That Works in Production

Sophie Martin

Sophie Martin

— 6 min read
DORA Compliance for Carrier Integrations: Security Implementation Guide That Works in Production

On January 17, 2025, DORA became applicable, creating mandatory security requirements for EU financial entities and their ICT service providers. For transport and logistics companies serving these sectors, the pressure extends far beyond simple compliance checkboxes. The regulation introduces stringent requirements on financial entities to establish robust ICT risk frameworks, continuous monitoring, incident response plans and business continuity measures.

Here's what makes DORA particularly challenging for carrier integration teams: Institutions found in breach of the Act may face fines of up to 2% of their total annual worldwide turnover or up to 1% of their average daily global turnover. In cases where individual fines apply, penalties can reach as high as €1 million. For critical ICT providers like transport management platforms, the penalties can be up to €5 million, while individuals within these providers may face fines of up to €500,000.

Why DORA Creates New Challenges for Carrier Integration Architecture

The enforcement deadline isn't just another compliance requirement. DORA is a European Union regulation that took effect on January 17, 2025. DORA aims to enhance the cyber resilience of financial institutions and strengthen operational continuity by ensuring banks, insurers, and investment firms can withstand, respond to, and recover from cyber threats.

What amplifies the complexity? Carrier APIs remain frustratingly non-standardized. Each integration becomes a custom project with unique authentication flows, payload structures, and error handling patterns. When you're managing direct connections to DHL Parcel, UPS Freight, FedEx Ground, DB Schenker, and DSV alongside multi-carrier platforms like nShift, EasyPost, and Cargoson, the compliance surface area expands exponentially.

Transport management software providers like MercuryGate, Descartes, and nShift now find themselves in DORA's crosshairs when serving financial sector clients. The regulation's comprehensive ICT risk management requirements don't distinguish between primary financial services and supporting logistics operations.

The Third-Party Risk Management Reality

Financial entities shall manage ICT third-party risk as an integral component of ICT risk within their ICT risk management framework. This isn't optional guidance; it's a binding requirement that transforms how you architect carrier integrations.

Consider the maintenance burden alone. When UPS changes their OAuth scope requirements or DHL modifies their tracking payload structure, your development team scrambles to update integrations while maintaining DORA compliance across the entire chain. DORA explicitly requires organizations to monitor their third-party ICT providers for compliance., because organizational security is only as strong as that of the weakest third-party vendor. Third parties can undermine your operational resilience in numerous ways.

Platforms handling this complexity include established players like EasyPost and ShipEngine, alongside Cargoson, each offering different approaches to third-party risk management in their carrier connectivity layers.

Essential Security Controls for DORA-Compliant Carrier APIs

Authentication failures in carrier integrations can derail entire shipping operations. Authentication verifies the identity of users and services accessing the API. Every request must include valid credentials like API keys or tokens. But DORA demands more than basic authentication.

DORA's Article 9 sets clear requirements for the secure exchange of data between financial institutions and third parties, stating that organizations must ensure the "confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data, including during transmission and storage."

For carrier API implementations, this translates to specific technical requirements:

  • TLS 1.3 with AES-256 encryption: Encrypt all communication between your APIs and client applications using industry-standard protocols such as HTTPS/TLS. Additionally, encrypt sensitive data at rest, such as in databases or storage systems
  • OAuth 2.1 or OpenID Connect: Skip basic authentication entirely. Skip Basic Auth. Go for API keys, OAuth, or OpenID instead. They're more secure and user-friendly
  • Role-based access controls: Authorization controls what verified users can access and do. Role-based access control limits users to only the resources they need

Transport execution software platforms like EasyPost, ShipEngine, and Cargoson implement these controls differently, with varying levels of granularity for multi-carrier environments.

Authentication and Authorization Patterns That Scale

Here's a test harness pattern for verifying OAuth flows across multiple carriers:

curl -X POST "https://api.carrier.com/oauth/token" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
  -d "grant_type=client_credentials&client_id=${CLIENT_ID}&client_secret=${CLIENT_SECRET}&scope=shipping.rates"

The response should include a time-bounded JWT token with explicit scopes. Third-party API integrations need careful vetting and monitoring. Each external service adds potential security risks to the system. Rotate these tokens every 24 hours maximum, and implement automatic revocation on suspicious activity patterns.

Continuous Monitoring and Incident Response Framework

Here's a sobering statistic: Only 27% fully map API endpoints that expose sensitive data. Less than half conduct API-specific penetration testing or continuous monitoring. For DORA compliance, this level of visibility won't cut it.

An incident classification and reporting framework for timely and accurate incident reporting to authorities becomes mandatory. This isn't just logging; it's structured incident response with specific timelines. The notification procedure requires an alert within 2 hours for any major incident, followed by a preliminary report within 24 hours and a complete file within 30 days.

Transportation management system providers like Transporeon and Blue Yonder have started implementing comprehensive monitoring dashboards. Cargoson's approach includes real-time API health monitoring across their carrier integration network, providing the visibility that DORA demands.

Freight management software teams need monitoring that captures:

  • API response times and failure rates by carrier
  • Authentication anomalies across integration points
  • Data payload changes that might indicate security issues
  • Webhook delivery failures that could signal system compromise

Real-Time API Health Monitoring

Real-time monitoring tools compare current API usage against established baselines. When traffic patterns deviate from normal levels, security teams receive instant alerts. For carrier integrations, this means tracking not just uptime but behavioral patterns.

Set alert thresholds that trigger on 15% deviation from baseline response times. When DHL's API suddenly takes 2.5 seconds instead of the usual 800ms, that's not just a performance issue—it might indicate a security incident in progress.

Monitor webhook latency across carriers. If FedEx webhooks normally arrive within 30 seconds but suddenly take 5 minutes, investigate immediately. Security teams need clear processes to handle detected threats. A centralized dashboard helps track and respond to security alerts quickly.

Contract and Governance Requirements Under DORA

DORA transforms standard vendor agreements into comprehensive risk management instruments. Financial entities are required to review and potentially amend contracts with technology service providers to ensure compliance with DORA, which includes preparing for heightened scrutiny and oversight.

Your contracts with carriers and multi-carrier shipping software providers must now include:

  • DORA compliance clauses: Explicit requirements for the vendor to maintain DORA-compliant security standards
  • Audit rights: Your ability to inspect their security practices and incident response procedures
  • Incident notification requirements: Mandatory disclosure within specified timeframes
  • Exit strategy documentation: Exit strategies shall take into account risks that may emerge at the level of ICT third-party service providers. Exit plans shall be comprehensive, documented and, in accordance with the criteria set out in Article 4(2), shall be sufficiently tested and reviewed periodically

Platforms like FreightPOP, Alpega, and Cargoson are updating their standard agreements to address these DORA requirements, but the implementation quality varies significantly.

Vendor Assessment Checklist

Before signing with any shipper TMS or multi-carrier shipping software provider, verify they can demonstrate:

  • ICT risk management frameworks that align with DORA requirements
  • Continuous monitoring capabilities for all API endpoints
  • Incident response procedures with defined escalation paths
  • Regular penetration testing and vulnerability assessments
  • Comprehensive logging and audit trail capabilities

The law recognizes that external providers are integral to the operations and security of financial services, so it mandates that financial institutions develop robust frameworks to manage third-party risks. One central element is drawing up and maintaining a Register of Information, which lists all your connections with ICT vendors.

Implementation Roadmap: 90-Day DORA Compliance Plan

With DORA already in effect, you need a focused implementation plan. Implementation projects for FEs covered by DORA should be well developed. The key deliverables FEs will need to have in place by January 17, 2025, are: An established ICT risk management framework identifying all ICT supported business functions and all sources of ICT risks, cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities.

Phase 1 (Days 1-30): Risk Assessment and Inventory

  • Map all carrier integration points and API endpoints
  • Document authentication methods currently in use
  • Identify data flows containing personal or financial information
  • Catalog third-party services across your transport management platform

Phase 2 (Days 31-60): Security Controls Implementation

  • Upgrade all connections to TLS 1.3
  • Implement OAuth 2.1 where carriers support it
  • Deploy API gateway for centralized security policy enforcement
  • Establish monitoring baselines for all carrier endpoints

Phase 3 (Days 61-90): Monitoring and Reporting Setup

  • Configure real-time alerts for security anomalies
  • Implement incident classification procedures
  • Test incident response workflows with simulated carrier outages
  • Establish regular reporting cadence to management

Comprehensive solutions like Manhattan Active, SAP TM, and Cargoson offer varying levels of built-in DORA compliance features, potentially accelerating your implementation timeline.

Testing and Validation Approach

DORA-regulated organizations need to implement regular testing programs (such as network security tests, pen tests, and web app tests) that identify potential gaps, vulnerabilities, and/or deficiencies that can impact the stability of their digital operations. Therefore, it's important to conduct mandatory reviews based on threat-led pen testing.

For carrier integrations, this means testing beyond functional requirements. Simulate authentication failures, inject malformed payloads, and verify that your monitoring systems detect these anomalies within defined thresholds.

Test your sandbox environments against production security standards. Equally important: regularly testing your APIs for vulnerabilities, including misconfigurations, lack of authentication controls, and unintended exposure to the public internet. Don't assume sandbox security is sufficient—DORA requires production-grade protection across all environments.

The path to DORA compliance isn't just about meeting regulatory requirements; it's about building resilient carrier integration architecture that can withstand the evolving threat landscape while maintaining the operational efficiency that modern logistics demands.

Read more